Entries in vision (5)

Friday
13Nov2009

Guy Writes: Flu Season Wisdom

Last Thursday, I went to bed with intense fatigue and a raw, cutting sore throat.  I stayed flat on my back all of Friday, Saturday, and Sunday with fitful nights punctuated by trips to the kitchen to gargle with warm salt water.  Finally, the light fever that had accompanied the fatigue lifted, and while even a brief journey off the couch left me weak, yesterday I could tell that the body was on the mend.  Today, incremental improvements in the same direction—I managed to take a shower, cook the morning oatmeal, and make coffee before needing to lie down again.

Through this extended bed rest, I listened to the audio version of “The E-myth Revisited,” a business book that I first picked up five years ago.  Hearing the gravelly voice of the author talk about the importance of “working on your business, not in it,” I could see the need for a change of structure in my own life.  Namely, due to the farm’s demands and my own penchant for satisfying others’ needs, I have fallen back into the trap that ensnares countless small businesspeople:  the trap of working endlessly just to keep up with the work.

Some would argue that a heavy workload requires such a call to arms.  After all, businesses have real needs, and isn’t the way to meet those needs to jump in the trench and get on with it? 

True, but an important distinction should be made regarding the exact type of work that is called for.  The E-myth divides tasks into two kinds of work:  tactical and strategic.  Tactical work relates to the work on the ground—the movement of resources, the gearing up for a big sale, the hiring of a summer staff, balancing the books.  Strategic work relates to maps, paper, and models—the planning of a business.  Strategic work means thinking about questions such as:  How do we grow?  What level of capital will we need in three years?  In five?  What information systems do I need in place to gather business data?

Typically, the tactical work is the easiest to focus on and in some ways the most rewarding.   It feels like real work, its effects can be readily seen.  A new water line is installed.  The pallets and cardboard at the fruit stand have been organized.  The high-tunnel has new end walls.  It’s no wonder I’ve been swept into this strong current.

But the critical reminder that this illness with all its flat couch time has brought me is the importance of the strategic work.  When will we plant more grapes?  When will the market expand?  Where will we increase our wine production?  How will we weave foodservice into the winery?  And that learning center we’ve been dreaming about, how far off is that in the plan?   In short, the strategic work asks questions related to where the business is going and how it will get there.  Steven Covey calls this “Beginning with the End in Mind.”

Answering these questions, or at least starting to ask them, requires time away from the din of the front lines, time for quiet thought and the scribbling of notes.  And given the complexity of our business, I am seeing that it isn’t enough to do this occasionally—say, every winter when a snow-storm sets in or a wicked bug lays me low.  If I want to continue to evolve the farm, and improve its elegance of operation (right now it runs a little crazy), more strategic time is required.  Regularly.  So, from my sick-bed, I am envisioning a weekly ration of a half a day of strategy.  I’m picturing this away from my office and the farm, in a place unencumbered with the papers, projects, and problems of daily life in the business.  Maybe the library?  Or a coffee shop?  We’ll see.

Some of you reading this are invariably involved with small business.  I’m curious:  how has this tension between the tactical and the strategic manifested in your own life?  How have you managed it?  What structures did you create to better help you focus on the strategic?  Did they work?  I’d love to hear from you on this front.  Please, send me an email and I’ll share some of the major themes later this winter with the farm community.

Until then, I’ve got some new work to get under way.  That is, just as soon as I have enough energy!
 

Monday
07Sep2009

Guy Writes: Better Living through Chemistry?

Back in my twenties, I went through a phase believing that all chemicals were bad and that organic food was never sprayed.     

Those were the days.  It was so simple to feel good about eating!  All I had to do was look for the word "organic" on the label and I knew I was chemical-free and supporting a sustainable form of food production.

Well, maybe not.  Since returning to the farm, and becoming not just a consumer but a producer of food, my naïve understanding has given way to a more nuanced, if not sometimes confused, attitude. Words like chemicals, sprays, organic, and sustainability are no longer straightforward.

Many people are surprised to learn that most of the organic food we see in the supermarket gets sprayed regularly with chemicals.  True, a different set of chemicals, but still chemicals.  In fact, most organic food is sprayed more often than conventional food.  This is because naturally derived, organically approved sprays are less potent than conventional sprays.  It is true that the less toxic organic sprays are not persistent on the food or in the environment.  But there are certainly downsides to using the organic spray also:  every time a spray is applied, that means more labor needed and more diesel fuel burned to run the tractor through the orchard.

There are other practices in organic production that get pretty sketchy sustainability ratings on the same ground.  Take mechanical weed control in orchards, for example.  Most orchards use a high tech cultivating machine to control weeds underneath the trees, instead of spraying an herbicide such as RoundUp.  Again, using the mechanical cultivator takes much more labor and burns more fossil fuel.   In addition, mechanical weed cultivation burns up organic matter in your soil and adds more carbon to the atmosphere. 

Weighing the complexities of the issue, I’m left at the end of the day wondering where the real focus should be on our farm and in food production.  Organic?  Conventional?  Somewhere in the middle? 

Back in the fifties the answer was easy—better living through chemistry.  The phrase was a spin-off of an ad slogan used by DuPont and it captured the focus of that decade.  After the deprivations of the Great Depression, Americans were understandably eager to make a better life for themselves.  They embraced the technical advances made during the war years and put them to good use in the post-war consumer economy.  In agriculture, for instance, factories and processes used to manufacture war agents could easily be converted toward manufacturing pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers.   

One really great chemical arrived on the farm just after the war ended.  It cut down the number of spray applications needed to control coddling moth from ten to three per season.  Plus, it didn’t leave heavy metals in the soil like lead arsenate did.  For the farmer, this new spray meant an amazing savings in time and expense.  Grandpa used it for years along the rest of the apple industry—until someone noticed the birds were dying.

In the decades following the fall-out of DDT, a few people decided to go back to the basics.  The organic movement began, drawing upon the pre-1940’s agricultural science.  Locally, folks like John Brownfield and Ray Fuller set out to produce organic apples.

Fast-forward four decades to today and the next-generation of tools available to organic producers.   Thanks to market and regulatory pressures applied during these past decades, chemical giants like Dow have recently released organic insecticide products that are easy on the environment and quite effective, GF-120 and Entrust to name a few.  These products make it possible to grow premium organic food on a large scale.  True, there is added expense, but it is possible.

When I shop in the supermarket, I still choose to pay the extra money for the organic label as I did in my twenties.  I know now that sprays are a part of food production, but the sprays used in organic production, generally speaking, are gentler.  I want to support the industries and farmers that are helping us move toward less toxic, yet effective insect controls.

I have chosen to go organic as a consumer, but it is a harder decision to make to go organic as a producer—especially on a farm with a long history of successful growing with conventional practices.  This question is rhetorical because all signs in our market point towards going organic.  Whether I have quandaries about the sustainability of various practices or not, you the consumer have spoken and asked for organic.  The only question is how and when to make the transition.  It’s not cheap to grow organically, not to mention it means learning a whole new set of skills and encountering issues we can hardly imagine right now.

As I look back at my twenties, it seems my habit of buying organic was as much about pushing against something old as it was about embracing something new. 

These days it feels like I’m in the middle—two feet rooted in soil farmed conventionally since my youth, two arms opening to a future of organic practices and all the complexity that comes with it.

 
Tuesday
18Aug2009

Guy Writes: Serve First

Every so often, a simple and elegant concept enters my life and I’m left completely altered.  In 2001, back when Dad was struggling to keep the farm and I was struggling as a freelance videographer, a friend gave me a copy of a paper on sustainable agriculture.   In those few pages, I found not only the gumption to co-create the documentary Broken Limbs which explores the ideas of sustainability, but ultimately the clarity to return to the Sunshine Farm and put these ideas into practice.

Back on the farm for six years now, I have learned a great deal about running a business, about retailing, wholesaling, and maintaining good books to keep it all straight.  But my biggest lessons have come in the arena of relationship.  How can I best lead?  How can I best motivate?  When is praise appropriate?  Criticism?  And to what degree with both?  These questions and more await each morning as the crew and I set out to work. 

Along the way, the few books on leadership and management I’ve read have left me unimpressed.  Too often the approach revolves around reaching some goal, around accomplishing the work-at-hand, but without giving much, if any, attention to the deeper question of ‘why are we doing this?’ 

But this spring, while drafting our vision and mission, I stumbled across the concept of Servant Leadership in a copy of a fruit industry magazine.  The article discussed how an apple grower in the Columbia Basin had built his entire business around this paradigm.

I knew in that moment I had found my leadership tribe.  Just as in 2001 when I first read about sustainable agriculture, I could sense the intrinsic validity of this leadership approach.  

Servant Leadership answers the ‘why we work’ question in two simple words: to serve.  Not to create widgets or to make money, not to advance up the career ladder or even to express ourselves with our talents and gifts.  These are all part of the experience, but ultimately, if they don’t add up to service, they don’t add up to much.

On one level, this is no insight at all.  The Nordstroms championed the paradigm that the customer is #1 decades ago.  But Servant Leadership is far more than just the making the customer happy.  It recognizes that good service to the customer extends from the front line cash register all the way to the owner or shareholders of the company.  Try to fake it with anything less systemic and you may reach short-term goals, but the long-term integrity of the business will suffer.   

It was this context that grabbed me last spring: a company-wide focus on serving each other as we all work towards growing and selling fruits, vegetables, and estate wine.  A week after reading the article, I downloaded an audiobook from Audible by James Hunter and started my education in Servant Leadership.

Mr. Hunter argues that an organization built upon service inherently attracts employees who are working not only with their hands and bodies, but also with their minds and imagination.  He calls them ‘head-down’ employees (versus ‘neck-down’), and they are workers who not only show up physically every morning but also bring their creativity and problem solving abilities to the game.

Hunter goes on to point out the difference between a relationship built around power and one built around authority.  A power-centered leadership style involves the neck-down crowd.  Think king/serf or master/slave; when the former speaks, the latter jumps … or else.  But a relationship built around authority is different.  Individuals respect the authority of a manager or boss, not because he shouts the loudest or has the power to hire and fire, but because he or she exhibits a consistency and a caring for both employee and organization.

This stuff is tricky to write about because we all have room for improvement.  I feel like I’m just beginning my work in this area.  But it is never hard to see where to serve.  As an employer, I aspire to provide a stable employment base that can be a cornerstone in an individual’s prosperity.  Part of this involves creating more year-round employment opportunities on the farm, better living-wages, and basic health insurance coverage.  There is plenty to be done. 

The paradigm of servant leadership speaks to me because it puts the bulls-eye on what matters most – helping others.  I look forward to integrating this paradigm deeper into our organization.  The effects on our business – serving you with the best in locally grown and produced food and wine – I can hardly imagine.

Tuesday
21Jul2009

Guy Writes: The Real Work

Sometimes my job is really frustrating. Sometimes it is all I can do to keep the frustration from spilling out and polluting everyone around me. Sometimes the condition persists for days, one moment after the next, with me, all the while, breathing in and out, riding it out (hopefully) like a wave.

After a while, I start to wonder if I am really doing the right type of work in life. Is this really my “path”? Should work really be this hard? Sometimes, I wonder if those types of people who chirp on about how they “love their work” ever experience such frustration. I wonder if they know the gnawing power of doubt as it eats away at self-confidence. I don’t know.

But I do know this: I love my work. For all of its frustrations, for all of its battering, I couldn’t imagine doing anything else. There is a deep sense of purpose in growing food, a sense of purpose that can transcend weariness, fatigue, frustration, and yes, even doubt.

Which is not to say this transcendence is easy. In the middle of tough times the only thing I know is that it hurts: I’m tired. It hurts. I’m weary. It hurts. I’m angry. It hurts. I’m insecure. It hurts. Until finally, at the end of the day, when the sun has finally gone down, I sit on the front porch with my hurts and ask, “What is all of this about?”

And usually the clarity returns. Calm lake. Periwinkle sky. Good food for generations. Local agriculture. Service. Off to bed.

Sometimes the redemption comes a little earlier in the day. On Monday, I listened to an interview of Matthew Crawford, author of “Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry into the Value of Work.” Crawford earned a PhD in philosophy before realizing that his work was not within the mind and academia, but with his hands and the machine shop. Eight years later, after building a successful business fixing motorbikes, he has written “Shop Class” to explore the theme of work.

The interviewer asked Crawford if he was fulfilled in his work. His response, in all of its honesty, fell like a cool spring shower all around me.

“Fulfillment would be too strong a word,” he said. “The work is often very frustrating. There’s a lot of cursing involved.

“And then there are moments of elation when you solve some problem . . . and you feel like you are three inches taller.”

At that moment, I happened to be in a pretty frustrating place. Farm work seemed to be anything but fulfilling. To hear this fellow talk about his own work-a-day reality in simple terms helped blow off some of my own pressure. He feels like I do. This must be normal.

Now, with a few days’ repose, it’s tempting to be glib; to write about how frustration and elation are both a part of a work day’s ration, how I welcome both equally with the new day sun.

That may be the desired outward appearance, a saint’s equanimity in the midst of the changes of life. But lets face it, inwardly, it’s a different story.

Anger brings elevated blood pressure, a shortening of breath, and a host of judgments and condemnations to the mind. Elation is the opposite. A relaxation, a blissful high, a loosening of one’s grip, sometimes too far.

The real work of work would seem to be gracefully navigating between the two.

 

Wednesday
08Jul2009

Guy Writes: Trusting in Tomorrow

Farming has its unknowns. Weather, markets, labor, equipment, crop varieties – the list is a long one. Each new day brings its own drama. Will the seeds germinate? Will the cherry pickers arrive? Will the old tractor make it through another year? Men and women of the soil have lived with these questions for generations.

But in prosperous valleys like our own, there is a new question to live with: land values and succession. Namely, how can a farm continue for another generation if the revenues won’t cover the land payments?

This wasn’t an issue for my great-grandfather in 1927 when he bought the family’s first ten acres just outside of Chelan. Nor for Grandpa Toad when he returned from the second World War and purchased the farm from his dad. And even my own dad was able to buy a small share of The Sunshine Farm in 1969 and with the revenues from fruit production eventually buy out other partners and become its owner.

This model won’t work for me and Rachel. Land values have shot through the roof and the profitability of farming our steep valley hillsides has diminished. Even the best farmer in the world couldn’t produce the sustained income stream required to pay for this land.

My dad’s conventional economic advice has been to move on, to find another less expensive piece of land to carry on the farming tradition. I’ve resisted this suggestion even as I have struggled to discern an alternative path. From the start, there has been discussion of development. But in what form and where? And might it be possible to integrate residential and commercial uses with farming activities? These have been the big unknowns of my agrarian career.

In grappling with these questions, we’ve learned a ton about land-use planning, zoning, re-zoning, urban growth boundaries, growth management, planned development districts, and the ease at which a consultant’s bill can rise through the tens of thousands of dollars! We’ve teamed up with our neighbors on the south shore to plan together and help spread out some of the cost, but it still has been some expensive schooling.

The process is far from over, but it looks like my reluctance to give up on farming here at Sunshine is being validated. It turns out that the type of farming we have been moving towards these past five years – diversified and organic – has quite an appeal in certain sectors of the real estate market. Last week, the New York Times ran an article entitled, “Organic Farms as Subdivision Amenities,” which outlined several developments that have integrated farming and development And so we continue on. The old adage “Success is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration” provides good council. The unknowns of land value, development, and succession swirl about. Our job is to get up every day, put on our boots, and head out the door. We plant carrots, thin apples, harvest cherries and tomatoes, clean the market, care for the wine, and try to find a little rest in between. Everything else will have to take care of itself.

This relinquishment of control caused me some degree of distress in my earlier years. But increasingly I find that relaxing into life’s unknowns brings with it a good bit of peace. Some might call it a dereliction of planning. I call it trusting in tomorrow. There is plenty on today’s plate to keep things interesting.